Triple POCUS: A New Approach to an Old Problem
Rafael Silva1, Diana Gonçalves1, João Pina Cabral1, Bráulio Gomes1, Jorge Teixeira2,José Mariz1
1Internal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
2Emergency Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal 3Emergency Department, Hospital of Braga/Medical School of University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
Doi: 10.12890/2018_000938 - European Journal of Case Reports in Internal Medicine - © EFIM 2018
Received: 23/07/2018
Accepted: 06/08/2018
Published: 28/08/2018

How to cite this article: Silva R, Gonçalves D, Cabral Pina J, Gomes B, Teixeira J, Mariz J. Triple POCUS: a new approach to an old problem. EJCRIM 2018;5 doi:10.12890/2018_000938.

Conflicts of Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests.
This article is licensed under a Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 License

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the most serious and life-threatening clinical presentation of venous thromboembolism, and difficult to diagnose. Triple point-of-care-ultrasonography (POCUS) of the lung, heart and leg veins is a multiorgan approach that may help to evaluate patients suspected of having PE, in combination with existing protocols and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). We present the case of a 26-year-old man with sudden onset of dyspnoea and swelling of the leg with a Well’s score of 9. With CTPA unavailable at the time of presentation, triple POCUS showed subpleural consolidations and a venous thrombus in a popliteal vein. A diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis with PE was made and the appropriate treatment was started immediately. Although triple POCUS has less sensitivity and specificity than CTPA, it could be very useful in some clinical settings.

LEARNING POINTS

KEYWORDS

Point-of-care ultrasonography, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, triple POCUS

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health problem, with an overall annual incidence of between 100 and 200 per 100,000 inhabitants[1]. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the most serious and life-threatening clinical presentation of VTE, and difficult to diagnose[2]. The European Society of Cardiology suggests that the best diagnostic strategy to confirm or exclude PE is to combine clinical assessment, plasma D-dimer measurement and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)[3]. Nowadays, the gold standard for making a diagnosis is CTPA, but this technique has some limitations such as high cost, unsuitability for unstable patients, and lack of 24-hour availability in some institutions, and is contraindicated in patients with renal failure or contrast allergy and in pregnant women[4,5].
Triple point-of-care-ultrasonography (POCUS) of the lung, heart and leg veins is a multiorgan protocol proposed as a new tool to evaluate patients suspected of having PE. The idea of single organ evaluation for the diagnosis of PE was studied previously[6,7], but low sensitivity and specificity have limited its clinical application. Nazerian et al. were the first to test the multiorgan approach, and the results were very encouraging with a high sensitivity (82.8–94.9%) and negative predictive value (91.4–97.5%)[4]. That led to some algorithms integrating triple POCUS with Well’s score and the D-dimer test to increase the pre-test probability of PE, and better select patients for CTPA[5]. In this case report, we discuss the triple POCUS approach for the diagnosis of PE, balancing its sensitivity and specificity with its potential to enhance the traditional physical examination.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present the case of a 26-year-old man with no previous medical history or and not on chronic medication. He was being treated for an upper airway infection with levofloxacin 500 mg once a day and ibuprofen 600 mg three times a day and had been on bedrest for the previous 3 days. He presented to the emergency department with a sudden onset of dyspnoea associated with a stabbing pain in the left hemithorax that aggravated with deep inspiration. The pain woke him in the middle of the night, and he felt tired and fatigued when he tried to walk. He denied fever, cough or purulent sputum. He had a respiratory rate of 24 breaths per minute with peripheral oxygen saturation of 92%, blood pressure of 138/79 mmHg and heart rate of 115 bpm. Chest auscultation revealed crepitations at the lower left lung base and rhythmic cardiac sounds without murmurs. There was noticeable swelling of the right leg that had been getting worse since the patient woke up, and the foot was warm and had normal colouration with the dorsalis pedis arterial pulse present. At this time, PE was the most probable diagnosis, with a calculated Well’s score of 9 points (clinical signs and symptoms of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 3 points; PE the most probable diagnosis, 3 points; heart rate >100, 1.5 points; immobilization for the last 3 days, 1.5 points; high-risk group for PE, pre-test probability of 40.6%). Laboratory analysis of blood showed pH 7.42, PaO2 62 mmHg, PaCO2 32 mmHg, HCO3– 24.4 mmol/l, SatO2 92.4%, and lactates 0.8 mg/dl. A chest x-ray did not show any significant abnormality and ECG demonstrated a sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 118 bpm. Laboratory evaluation showed leukocytes in the normal range (6.3×109/l) and a slightly elevated C-reactive protein (1.44 mg/dl). CPTA was not available at the time of presentation, so the triple POCUS protocol was applied as follows:

References
  1. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost 2007;98:756–764.
  2. Agnelli G, Becattini C. Accuracy of point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med2010;363:266–274.
  3. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Di Bartolomeo R, Eggebrecht H, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Eur Heart J 2014;35:2873–2926.
  4. Nazerian P, Vanni S, Volpicelli G, Gigli C, Zanobetti M, Bartolucci M, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest 2014;145:950–957.
  5. Squizzato A, Galli L, Gerdes VEA. Point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Crit Ultrasound J 2015;7:7.
  6. Winkler MH, Touw HR, van de Ven PM, Twisk J, Tuinman PR. Diagnostic accuracy of chest radiograph, and when concomitantly studied lung ultrasound, in critically ill patients with respiratory symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2018;46:e707–e714.
  7. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J. The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:1044–1049.
  8. Santos TM, Franci D, Coutinho CMG, Ribeiro DL, Schweller M, Matos-Souza JR, et al. A simplified ultrasound-based edema score to assess lung injury and clinical severity in septic patients. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31:1656–1660.
  9. Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Braunwald E. Time to add a fifth pillar to bedside physical examination. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3346.